[131151] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 =?UTF-8?B?4oCU?= Unique local addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Smith)
Wed Oct 20 21:54:02 2010
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:23:04 +1030
From: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
To: matthew@matthew.at
In-Reply-To: <4CBF9B7A.1000500@matthew.at>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:46:34 -0700
Matthew Kaufman <matthew@matthew.at> wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 6:20 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> >
> > To make it clear, as it seems to be quite misunderstood, you'd have
> > both ULA and global addressing in your network.
>
> Right. Just like to multihome with IPv6 you would have both PA addresses
> from provider #1 and PA addresses from provider #2 in your network.
>
> Only nobody wants to do that either.
>
So you speak for everybody? I can do that too. Nobody wants to run NAT
anymore either.
