[126975] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP Responsibilities [WAS: Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Wed Jun 9 10:51:21 2010
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:51:10 -0500
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <9ABFA6B4-52EF-4A7E-B7A2-0E695AC83669@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 6/9/2010 06:14, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> To cut through the noise and non-relevant discussion, let's see if we can
>> boil this down to a couple of issues:
>>
>> 1. Should ISPs be responsible for abuse from within their customer base?
>>
> Yes, but, there should be an exemption from liability for ISPs that take
> action to resolve the situation within 24 hours of first awareness (by
> either internal detection or external report).
What happened to the acronyms "AUP" and "TOS"?
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
the vote.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
