[126039] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: the alleged evils of NAT,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Wed Apr 28 18:11:27 2010
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:54:04 MST."
<01F57362-8092-48CB-8336-15B9CC1713C2@virtualized.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:07:15 +1000
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <01F57362-8092-48CB-8336-15B9CC1713C2@virtualized.org>, David Conrad
writes:
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> > I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part =
> of the v6 internet=20
>
> Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to =
> renumber?
We have that ability already. Doesn't require NAT.
> Regards,
> -drc
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
