[126035] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: the alleged evils of NAT,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Wed Apr 28 17:55:11 2010
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <A94A830D-AC48-4074-9D76-073F73E2C87E@skytap.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:54:04 -0700
To: Carl Rosevear <crosevear@skytap.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part =
of the v6 internet=20
Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to =
renumber?
Regards,
-drc
