[126048] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: the alleged evils of NAT,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Apr 29 00:37:39 2010
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:54:04 PDT."
<01F57362-8092-48CB-8336-15B9CC1713C2@virtualized.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:36:24 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1272515784_7350P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:54:04 PDT, David Conrad said:
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> > I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part
> > of the v6 internet
>
> Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?
RFC4193 or PI address space, depending what problem you're trying to solve
by not renumbering.
--==_Exmh_1272515784_7350P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFL2QzIcC3lWbTT17ARAqSEAJwNYd60F4HXY9JzOnWh2DTVyHlMegCg7Ts+
6yYrVSOzm3OUEwmScfuions=
=NX6i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1272515784_7350P--
