[125531] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Greco)
Mon Apr 19 11:24:20 2010
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
To: nick@foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:23:46 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BCC74C9.9090303@foobar.org> from "Nick Hilliard" at Apr 19,
2010 05:20:41 PM
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> On 19/04/2010 16:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure the acceptance of NAT varies regionally. I think
> > there's a large ISP in Italy which has been doing NAT since the 90s.
>
> to my knowledge, if we're talking about the same organisation, this large
> ISP is moving away from NAT, or already has done so.
>
> Sure, you can NAT eyeballs, but it hurts like hell.
Which hurts more ... NATting eyeballs, or blinding them entirely?
Eventually we'll run out. Then we get to pick.
... JG
--
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
