[125530] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Mon Apr 19 11:21:40 2010
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:20:41 +0200
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
In-Reply-To: <871veb4hrr.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 19/04/2010 16:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the acceptance of NAT varies regionally. I think
> there's a large ISP in Italy which has been doing NAT since the 90s.
to my knowledge, if we're talking about the same organisation, this large
ISP is moving away from NAT, or already has done so.
Sure, you can NAT eyeballs, but it hurts like hell.
Nick
