[124518] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Apr 1 13:41:27 2010
To: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick@zill.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:18:54 EDT."
<4BB4109E.90006@zill.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:40:17 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1270143617_3939P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:18:54 EDT, Patrick Giagnocavo said:
> > However, there will be a time when a significant number of
> > customers will not be able to access your content.
>
> ^^ Uncertainty .
>
> > What percentage of sales are you willing to eat?
>
> ^^ Fear .
> > Are you willing to gamble your business on your expectations? Business
> > models will develop that will take advantage of global addressing to end
> > devices. The Next Big (Nth) Thing will. Do you feel that you have a perfect
> > Crystal Ball, or do you want to start hedging your bets now?
>
> ^^ Doubt.
So tell me Patrick - if you're not doing anything about it while it's still FUD,
that leaves 2 questions:
1) How long will it take for you to design, test, and deploy once it's no
longer FUD?
2) Will your business survive the ensuing pain waiting for deploy to complete?
--==_Exmh_1270143617_3939P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFLtNqBcC3lWbTT17ARAjWxAKC1/UIqy66avWCtBSGpAoARKmyNggCg0HVW
SgYIiga5fnDfdDm10fW/k5w=
=PzIs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1270143617_3939P--
