[124538] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Apr 2 01:17:21 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004011110520.52094@murf.icantclick.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:39:10 -0700
To: david raistrick <drais@icantclick.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 1, 2010, at 8:13 AM, david raistrick wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>=20
>> On 03/31/2010 08:52 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
>>> We have just (anecdotally, empirically) established earlier in this
>>> thread, that anything smaller than a mid-sized business, can't even
>>> *GET* IPv6 easily (at least in the USA); much less care about it.
>>=20
>> fwiw, that last time I was at a company that needed a prefix, we =
wrote
>> up an addressing plan, applied, received an assignment, payed our =
money
>> and were done. if a pool of public addresses are a resource you need =
to
>=20
>=20
> But were you able to get transit that let you use the address space?
>=20
> I'm sure it's getting better, but as recently as 2 years ago it was =
near impossible to get for most areas (and most providers, and most colo =
facilities).
>=20
Worst case, it's easy with a free tunnel now, and, in most cases, better =
solutions are readily available.
Owen
