[123322] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP4 Space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Fri Mar 5 08:25:02 2010
In-Reply-To: <5BE3CF7E-961C-42E3-9262-92439B994428@virtualized.org>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:24:15 -0500
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:15 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 2:30 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?
>
> We do?
>
> Why do we expect this?
David,
Well, I don't know that "we" do, but Joel made a remarkable assertion
that non-aggregable assignments to end users, the ones still needed
for multihoming, would go down under IPv6. I wondered about his
reasoning. Stan then offered the surprising clarification that a
reduction in the use of NAT would naturally result in a reduction of
multihoming.
Regards,
Bill
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
