[123319] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP4 Space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andy Davidson)
Fri Mar 5 07:22:56 2010
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:22:17 +0000
From: Andy Davidson <andy@nosignal.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <3c3e3fca1003041130v7691ea97r48cb48cdd92fe7b0@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 04/03/2010 19:30, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
>> handling the v6 table is not currently hard (~2600 prefixes) while long
>> term the temptation to do TE is roughly that same in v6 as in v4, the
>> prospect of having a bunch of non-aggregatable direct assignments should
>> be much lower...
> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?
The opposite, but a clean slate means multihomed networks with many v4
prefixes may be able to be a multihomed network with just one v6 prefix.
Andy
