[123280] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Alcatel-Lucent
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chadwick Sorrell)
Thu Mar 4 18:15:18 2010
In-Reply-To: <EBE0AB48-CD27-4DF2-B833-B414B763604C@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:14:46 -0500
From: Chadwick Sorrell <mirotrem@gmail.com>
To: Craig <cvuljanic@gmail.com>
Cc: "<nanog@nanog.org>" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'll have to second everything everyone is saying. Absolutely pleased
with everything about them. Just wish I had more 7750s instead of
7450s.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Craig <cvuljanic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Very good routers. We have been using them for several years now. Very so=
lid
> product, and very easy to setup services: ie vprn/ vpls/ epipe, etc.
>
> The qos on the box is very scalable. I could talk more about them off lin=
e
> with you or discuss more over phone.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 5:22 PM, "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> --- lists@iamchriswallace.com wrote:
>> I am hoping to get some peoples opinions on Alcatel-Lucent routers. =A0W=
e
>> are looking at the 7750 SR line and the 7450 ESS line. =A0We are current=
ly a
>> Cisco shop but these would be deployed in a completely new network
>> delivering mostly MPLS based services and DIA. =A0Any comments are welco=
me,
>> =A0good and bad.
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> We deploy these. =A0They are very different from cisco (so there will be=
a
>> big learning curve) and kick ass. =A0Be sure to go to 7.<something> as c=
flowd
>> (their netflow) does not report correctly on things like ASN.
>>
>> scott
>>
>
>
