[122038] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How polluted is 1/8?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tico)
Thu Feb 4 15:20:32 2010
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:18:37 -0600
From: Tico <tico-nanog@raapid.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <75cb24521002041214i3670acbp87c314f29c5749@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2/4/10 2:14 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> I know someone who'd happily sink both the /24's in question.. if apnic's
> interested.
>
Ditto.
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jared Mauch<jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some
>>>>
>> measurements to find out how "polluted" this block really is.
>>
>>>> See some surprising results on RIPE Labs:
>>>>
>> http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18
>>
>>>> Please also note the call for feedback at the bottom of the article.
>>>>
>>> The most surprising thing in that report was that someone has an AMS-IX
>>> port at just 10 megs. It would be nice to see an actual measurement of
>>> the traffic and daily/weekly changes. A breakdown of the flow data by
>>> source ASN and source prefix (for the top 50-100 sources) would also be
>>> interesting.
>>>
>> There was a call on the apnic list for someone to sink some of the traffic.
>>
>> I'd like to see someone capture the data and post pcaps/netflow analysis,
>> and possibly just run a http server on that /24 so people can test if their
>> network is broken.
>>
>> I've taken a peek at the traffic, and I don't think it's 100's of megs, but
>> without a global view who knows.
>>
>> - Jared
>>
>>
