[122047] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: How polluted is 1/8?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Thu Feb 4 15:42:31 2010

From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B6B2B9D.6080004@raapid.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:41:57 -0500
To: Tico <tico-nanog@raapid.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

If it's not obvious, I've thoguht about this and made some offers to the =
people at APNIC/RIPE.

Hoping someone moves forward with this.

The note was on the apops list (iirc).

- jared

On Feb 4, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Tico wrote:

> On 2/4/10 2:14 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> I know someone who'd happily sink both the /24's in question.. if =
apnic's
>> interested.
>>  =20
> Ditto.
>=20
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jared Mauch<jared@puck.nether.net>  =
wrote:
>>=20
>>  =20
>>> On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
>>>=20
>>>    =20
>>>> Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
>>>>      =20
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some
>>>>>        =20
>>> measurements to find out how "polluted" this block really is.
>>>    =20
>>>>> See some surprising results on RIPE Labs:
>>>>>        =20
>>> http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18
>>>    =20
>>>>> Please also note the call for feedback at the bottom of the =
article.
>>>>>        =20
>>>> The most surprising thing in that report was that someone has an =
AMS-IX
>>>> port at just 10 megs.  It would be nice to see an actual =
measurement of
>>>> the traffic and daily/weekly changes. A breakdown of the flow data =
by
>>>> source ASN and source prefix (for the top 50-100 sources) would =
also be
>>>> interesting.
>>>>      =20
>>> There was a call on the apnic list for someone to sink some of the =
traffic.
>>>=20
>>> I'd like to see someone capture the data and post pcaps/netflow =
analysis,
>>> and possibly just run a http server on that /24 so people can test =
if their
>>> network is broken.
>>>=20
>>> I've taken a peek at the traffic, and I don't think it's 100's of =
megs, but
>>> without a global view who knows.
>>>=20
>>> - Jared
>>>=20
>>>    =20
>=20



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post