[122037] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How polluted is 1/8?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Thu Feb 4 15:18:20 2010
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <75cb24521002041214i3670acbp87c314f29c5749@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:17:56 -0500
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 4, 2010, at 3:14 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> I know someone who'd happily sink both the /24's in question.. if =
apnic's
> interested.
Given that it is not in the table today, just announcing it would yield =
both interesting traffic, and interesting data on who is filtering it.
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> =
wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
>>=20
>>> Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some
>> measurements to find out how "polluted" this block really is.
>>>> See some surprising results on RIPE Labs:
>> http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18
>>>> Please also note the call for feedback at the bottom of the =
article.
>>>=20
>>> The most surprising thing in that report was that someone has an =
AMS-IX
>>> port at just 10 megs. It would be nice to see an actual measurement =
of
>>> the traffic and daily/weekly changes. A breakdown of the flow data =
by
>>> source ASN and source prefix (for the top 50-100 sources) would also =
be
>>> interesting.
>>=20
>> There was a call on the apnic list for someone to sink some of the =
traffic.
>>=20
>> I'd like to see someone capture the data and post pcaps/netflow =
analysis,
>> and possibly just run a http server on that /24 so people can test if =
their
>> network is broken.
>>=20
>> I've taken a peek at the traffic, and I don't think it's 100's of =
megs, but
>> without a global view who knows.
>>=20
>> - Jared
>>=20
>=20
