[112637] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Stites)
Wed Mar 11 16:29:17 2009
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:29:05 -0800
From: Larry Stites <ncnet@sbcglobal.net>
To: Bill Blackford <BBlackford@nwresd.k12.or.us>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <6069A203FD01884885C037F81DD75080CA064DA9@wsc-mail-01.intra.nwresd.k12.or.us>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Bill,
As far as pricing for refurbished Cisco Supervisor Engines the 3BXL is
selling for around $7500 whereas the WS-SUP32-10GE-3B $5500, WS-SUP32-GE-3B
$2500...
Best regards,
Larry E. Stites
Northern California Networks, Inc.
LIC# 2004 SR KH 100-484111
Nevada City, CA 95959
on 3/11/09 10:18 AM, Bill Blackford wrote:
> Anyone have any experience with SUP32? Please contact me off list.
>
> I'm trying to evaluate a lower-cost alternative to the 720-3bxl.
> I'm only pushing a few hundred megs of traffic, exchanging a few routes with
> less than 20 peers and don't see the need for a 720's worth of throughput in
> the near future.
>
> Can the 32 handle a full table?
> How does the MFSC2A compare to the MFSC3?
> V6 support?
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Bill Blackford
> Senior Network Engineer
>
> my /home away from home
