[112634] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SUP720 vs. SUP32
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Wed Mar 11 15:34:24 2009
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:34:12 +0900
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: Bill Blackford <BBlackford@nwresd.k12.or.us>
In-Reply-To: <6069A203FD01884885C037F81DD75080CA064DD9@wsc-mail-01.intra.nwresd.k12.or.us>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009, Bill Blackford wrote:
> Thank you to everyone who offered advice. I thinks it's clearer what my path should be.
>
> Incidentally, I am using 7300/7200 based units with G1 RP and found that at 200M they start seeing 50% CPU load which is why I'm looking to go to the next step.
Check the cisco-nsp archive, specifically from Rodney; he has talked about what
the CPU load versus throughput implications are on the G1 and G2. It might
surprise you a little.
Adrian
