[112627] in North American Network Operators' Group
SUP720 vs. SUP32
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Blackford)
Wed Mar 11 14:19:56 2009
From: Bill Blackford <BBlackford@nwresd.k12.or.us>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:18:11 -0700
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Anyone have any experience with SUP32? Please contact me off list.
I'm trying to evaluate a lower-cost alternative to the 720-3bxl.
I'm only pushing a few hundred megs of traffic, exchanging a few routes wit=
h less than 20 peers and don't see the need for a 720's worth of throughput=
in the near future.
Can the 32 handle a full table?
How does the MFSC2A compare to the MFSC3?
V6 support?
Thank you.
--
Bill Blackford =20
Senior Network Engineer =20
my /home away from home
