[111342] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=A5ns_Nilsson?=)
Wed Feb 4 18:09:48 2009
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:09:22 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=A5ns_Nilsson?= <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: Ricky Beam <jfbeam@gmail.com>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <op.uoumr5jwtfhldh@rbeam.xactional.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==========9EE30CAC425FC6ACA000==========
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
--On onsdag, onsdag 4 feb 2009 17.44.20 -0500 Ricky Beam <jfbeam@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:29:36 -0500, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve@skeeve.org>
> wrote:
>> I agree... I'd love to know where they got that from... who even wrote =20
>> it?
>=20
> I see you've never done business with EDS. They've been using 1/8 for
> over a decade. Also, over the years, I've seen a number of universities
> and supercomputing facilities number nodes out of 1/8 -- however, those
> systems are never supposed to see the internet anyway, so they could
> technically number them however they want. Personally, I've used 1/8 in
> lab setups.
Last time I built a supercomputer (as in a cluster of run-of-the-mill
servers) RIPE gave us a /21 -- I wanted a /20 for the expected upgrade but
was told I had to reapply. The compute nodes need to read files from AFS
from CERN or another university, so NAT'ing them is so not an option.=20
--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson M A C H I N A
Sign my PETITION.
--==========9EE30CAC425FC6ACA000==========
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFJiiAi02/pMZDM1cURAvMyAJ9vyCflflQ6zMT32RGFIhjwlZjdHACcD4aB
ZeIuyBWW0CDhWM0Up/FJaqQ=
=ppBm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==========9EE30CAC425FC6ACA000==========--
