[111379] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ricky Beam)
Wed Feb 4 21:21:17 2009
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:19:28 -0500
To: "James R. Cutler" <james.cutler@consultant.com>, nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D11DD8C1-B5CB-4898-B6BF-6C051391AC89@consultant.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:35:15 -0500, James R. Cutler
<james.cutler@consultant.com> wrote:
> Clarification here:
>
> 1/8 was never on the EDS backbone. Was only used locally in one site,
> as far as I can determine.
They might have done that for other customers as well. (to avoid 10/8
collisions.) Personally, I'd think if they were going to NAT at the edge,
they'd only set it up for the machines we were supposed to use, instead,
we could see, well, a lot more than we should have.
--Ricky
