[111277] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Hallgren)
Mon Feb 2 17:50:52 2009
From: Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr>
To: Johnny Eriksson <bygg@cafax.se>
In-Reply-To: <CMM.0.91.0.1233613043.bygg@nic.cafax.se>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:50:38 +0100
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--=-jbF6knfbiX/XNAmZGbPf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Le lundi 02 f=C3=A9vrier 2009 =C3=A0 23:17 +0000, Johnny Eriksson a =C3=A9c=
rit :
> Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr>:
>=20
> > > Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses tha=
n
> > > RFC1918 gives you.
> >=20
> > Use IPv6.
>=20
> For an IPv4 scalability test? Interesting idea...
Plaisanterie of sorts... But off "plaisanterie," I ref. the statement
above.=20
>=20
> Apart from the basic incompability here, my opinion of IPv6 is that it
> just gives you 2^96 more addresses to repeat all the old mistakes with.
>=20
Some mistakes, sure; not all. Keep the multihoming game in mind, for
instance. Sure is that misuse is much possible also in the IPv6 space!
Cheers,
mh
> --Johnny
>=20
--=20
michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
--=-jbF6knfbiX/XNAmZGbPf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAkmHeLkACgkQZNZ/rrgsqacYIQCglHDCdOEfVzoyI//rvp2ANduK
AbUAniE9HK44N+8Dj+Nptspet0fEQbNg
=EceK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-jbF6knfbiX/XNAmZGbPf--
