[111276] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Feb 2 17:30:21 2009
To: Johnny Eriksson <bygg@cafax.se>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:17:23 GMT."
<CMM.0.91.0.1233613043.bygg@nic.cafax.se>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:30:10 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1233613810_15229P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:17:23 GMT, Johnny Eriksson said:
> Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren@free.fr>:
>
> > > Really really LARGE scalability testing that needs more addresses than
> > > RFC1918 gives you.
> >
> > Use IPv6.
>
> For an IPv4 scalability test? Interesting idea...
Might wanna consider that if you're doing a scalability *test* that burns over
a /8 of IPv4, how do you intend to *deploy* the sucker? Gonna be a bear
trying to get a /8 or 3 allocated when The Final Days are upon us already...
--==_Exmh_1233613810_15229P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFJh3PycC3lWbTT17ARAkvJAKDInilt4h6+PrD7Ylr78r8fx2YHTQCgjtAv
uyV+D83mVygu6DAG/9h2Vos=
=MZLo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1233613810_15229P--
