[110949] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Are we really this helpless? (Re: isprime DOS in progress)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roland Dobbins)
Sat Jan 24 01:04:32 2009
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <497AA86C.7050609@brightok.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:04:17 +0800
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Jan 24, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> Now I have fun trying to explain towards upstream management why a
> good security team and policy is important in anyone we purchase
> transit from.
Apart from commercial DDoS mitigation services, how many folks have
SLAs which specify DoS-related response-times, ETRs, specify levels of
service degradation, et. al. as part of their transit contracts,
peering agreements, hosting/co-location agreements, etc.? How many
end-customers have these terms written into their contracts with their
SPs?
Has anyone ever de-peered or terminated a transit or hosting/co-
location relationship specifically due to DoS issues? If so, was it
based upon specific contractual clauses related to DoS, or was some
other metric used to justify ending the arrangement (i.e., non-
adherence to traffic ratios due to DoS traffic, or other effects)?
Did you have to pay a termination fee to get out of the arrangement?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@cisco.com> // +852.9133.2844 mobile
All behavior is economic in motivation and/or consequence.
