[110950] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: inauguration streams review
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Florian Weimer)
Sat Jan 24 09:58:58 2009
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: "Adam Greene" <maillist@webjogger.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:58:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: <60C736580784448E8881314F3E51952D@GINKGO> (Adam Greene's message
of "Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:08:30 -0500")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
* Adam Greene:
> Hi, quick question ...
>
> Most people here said they saw most of the inauguration traffic on
> TCP1935 to Limelight and UDP8247 to CNN. However, we were seeing it
> simply as "http" traffic (i.e. port 80), which made it very difficult
> to manage. Our inbound bandwidth was effectively maxed out for about 6
> hours.
80/TCP is often used as fallback if the other methods fail to work.
Have you got any filters on your network which might cause this?
