[110935] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Are we really this helpless? (Re: isprime DOS in progress)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Fri Jan 23 21:05:48 2009

Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:05:43 -0800
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1232761823.25013.5.camel@roswell.ausics.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

Noel Butler wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 07:21, Chris McDonald wrote:
> 
>> We [AS3491] null0'd the IP earlier.  Rest-of-world encouraged to do the same :/
>>
> 
> 
> 
> Wrong approach, they are *innocent* in this as are the new targets.
> 
> insert into your favourite acl:
> deny udp host 66.230.160.1 neq 53 any eq 53
> deny udp host 66.230.128.15 neq 53 any eq 53
> 
> But it's much less work to add a filter on the name server as others
> have mentioned.
> 
> 


Having the world trying to keep up with ACL entries seems futile. Is 
there really nothing to be done about this? (Yes, I know, BCP38, but 
obviously the accomplice providers don't care.)

~Seth


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post