[10258] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: MCI outages (summary)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Shaw)
Thu Jun 26 17:17:59 1997

Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 16:06:16 -0500 (CDT)
From: Joe  Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
To: Robert_Gutierrez@3com.com
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <882564C2.0064EAB4.00@hqoutbound.ops.3com.com>

From what I understand of MCI's peering agreement, you have to come into
at least 3 NAPs with DS3 bandwidth or better to even be considered to
peer.  So, I think if you peer with MCI, you'd definitely carry enough
weight with them that they'd take an interest with what problems you have.

Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
"Learn more, and you will never starve." - Paraphrase of Lee

On Thu, 26 Jun 1997 Robert_Gutierrez@3com.com wrote:

> OK, here's a scenario for you.  Traceroute fails inside MCI somewhere.  So
> you
> call your upstream, and said upstream only has a peering relationship with
> MCI -- ie: not a paying customer.  I'm under the impression that unless
> you're
> a paying customer, then (to quote a 70's phrase) "you don't have nothin'
> comin'".
> 
> For those ISP/IBP's out there, can a BGP peer open a trouble ticket with
> you to have a problem looked at?  Or does the "paying customer" have to
> open the TT.  What if I can't get the "paying customer" to open up the TT
> (ie: you think I can get sex.com to open a TT with their upstream, as if
> they
> would care longer than the time to hit the "D" key on my message).
> 
>      rob
> 
> 
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post