[954] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: KDK: No Mandatory Meal Plan

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Darius Jazayeri)
Sat Oct 20 16:37:50 2001

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Message-ID:  <5.0.2.1.2.20011020155945.02af3e40@hesiod>
Date:         Sat, 20 Oct 2001 16:32:51 -0400
From:         Darius Jazayeri <jazayeri@MIT.EDU>
To:           MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To:  <200110201059.GAA16680@hikari-no-ken.mit.edu>

Err...

Kirk asked us, at a meeting of FSILG presidents, what kind of concerns our
houses had with the new dining system. Institutionally, we're concerned
about dorm-dwelling frosh (and upperclassmen) being forced by the system to
eat on campus. (Given the history of administrative decisions screwing us
over, I'd say that's quite reasonable.)

I'm just as against mandatory on-campus dining as you are, purely
on  principle. (So, I'm sure, are all the other presidents.) In addition,
it would be bad for the future of my house. There's no contradiction there.

Your email is unfair. Just because we care about the impact of this
decision on our future survival, when asked about it in a meeting in that
context, does not make us unfeeling evil monsters.

-Darius (ADP President /and/ activist)


At 06:59 AM 10/20/2001 -0400, Christopher D. Beland wrote:
> > At this point, I haven't seen any proposed major overhauls that would
> > negatively affect IFC members, or more importantly, member houses' ability
> > to get freshmen over to their houses for meals. From what I heard at the
> > last President's Council, those are your primary FSILG-related
> > concerns.
>
>Ah, I am reminded of the Rush Chairs meeting where the debate was over
>whether Killian Kickoff, I think it was, should be "grabbing or no
>grabbing."  The room was decidedly for "grabbing," though the
>executive members seemed to want to moderate things a bit more than
>their constituents.  Glad to hear the Presidents are still concerned
>about them recruitment numbers, to hell with feeding the frosh stuck
>on campus, cheaply or otherwise.
>
>-B.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post