[953] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: KDK: No Mandatory Meal Plan
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher D. Beland)
Sat Oct 20 07:03:36 2001
Message-ID: <200110201059.GAA16680@hikari-no-ken.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 06:59:37 -0400
From: "Christopher D. Beland" <beland@MIT.EDU>
To: MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: The events that comprise the history of the universe.
> At this point, I haven't seen any proposed major overhauls that would
> negatively affect IFC members, or more importantly, member houses' ability
> to get freshmen over to their houses for meals. From what I heard at the
> last President's Council, those are your primary FSILG-related
> concerns.
Ah, I am reminded of the Rush Chairs meeting where the debate was over
whether Killian Kickoff, I think it was, should be "grabbing or no
grabbing." The room was decidedly for "grabbing," though the
executive members seemed to want to moderate things a bit more than
their constituents. Glad to hear the Presidents are still concerned
about them recruitment numbers, to hell with feeding the frosh stuck
on campus, cheaply or otherwise.
-B.
