[2667] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: [Mit-talk] Upcoming UA Issue - Student Group Property Ownership
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Sniffen)
Tue Oct 17 14:33:46 2006
From: Brian Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
To: Alexander J Werbos <awerbos@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:32:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62L.0610171404240.24754@dodecahedron.mit.edu>
(Alexander J. Werbos's message of "Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:13:15 -0400
(EDT)")
Cc: Adam Seering <aseering@mit.edu>, mit-talk@mit.edu
Errors-To: mit-talk-bounces@mit.edu
Would the UA pay the Logs for repair of the studio if one of these
groups break it? What about upkeep costs?
Alex, you should know that groups regularly pay LSC for advertising
slides, the Tech for advertisements beyond the one page free granted
by the Tech to each group, etc. In your communist world, would the UA
also pay the printer for the Tech when groups each want big ads
weekly?
Actually, the Tech's got a fortune in the bank. I can think of lots
of groups that could make use of that more efficiently. Can the
croquet club petition for access to the Tech's cash? Large-screen TV?
-Brian
--
Brian Sniffen bts@alum.mit.edu
_______________________________________________
MIT-talk mailing list
MIT-talk@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mit-talk