[2666] in Discussion of MIT-community interests
Re: [Mit-talk] Upcoming UA Issue - Student Group Property Ownership
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexander J Werbos)
Tue Oct 17 14:29:32 2006
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:28:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alexander J Werbos <awerbos@mit.edu>
To: Brian Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <861wp6by2u.fsf@teleri.evenmere.org>
Cc: Jacob Faber <jacob.faber@gmail.com>, mit-talk@mit.edu
Errors-To: mit-talk-bounces@mit.edu
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Brian Sniffen wrote:
> Alexander J Werbos <awerbos@mit.edu> writes:
>
>> Just to briefly add, I would ask that the UA Facilitators make judgment
>> based on three criteria:
>>
>> 1) The resource being discussed is not being used to its fullest
>> efficiency by the group currently controlling it
>> 2) Another group can demonstrate a compelling use for this resource
>> 3) The reallocation of the resource will not seriously impact the group
>> currently controlling it
>
> Those rules don't obviously inhibit flip-flopping. I'd hope to see a
> proof of stability for any such resolution.
I see reallocation as an irreversible transformation to "semi-public"
space, which is then allocated to various groups. Therefore, there is nothing to
flop to.
-Alex
_______________________________________________
MIT-talk mailing list
MIT-talk@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mit-talk
