[1023] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Shin article in Globe:"Parents were last to know"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Susan Buchman)
Thu Jan 31 12:49:05 2002

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
              boundary="------------2F60F285ECF3FF726B3A33CC"
Message-ID:  <3C597D9F.52086237@cs.cmu.edu>
Date:         Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:23:43 -0500
From:         Susan Buchman <smb+@CS.CMU.EDU>
To:           MIT-Talk@MIT.EDU

--------------2F60F285ECF3FF726B3A33CC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I think there are some people who,
> if they were converned about the confidentiality of MIT mental health
> services, would choose not to take advantage of these services even though
> the services would benefit them tremenously, and possibly even save their
> lives. The article does not address this point, and i feel that this is a
> failure on its part.

not only does it not address the point, she actually implies

that chipping away at privacy rights will *improve* mental

health care. she clearly has no understanding of the nature

of most therapist-patient relationships, and decided

to fill a column with assumptions and misreprentations.

she's advocating a very irresponsible position.

does mit have a "suicide problem"? yes. do we solve it

by making people (more) afraid to seek therapy? uh, no.

susan buchman '01

--------------2F60F285ECF3FF726B3A33CC
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>

<pre>> I think there are some people who,
> if they were converned about the confidentiality of MIT mental health
> services, would choose not to take advantage of these services even though
> the services would benefit them tremenously, and possibly even save their
> lives. The article does not address this point, and i feel that this is a
> failure on its part.</pre>

<pre>not only does it not address the point, she actually implies</pre>

<pre>that chipping away at privacy rights will *improve* mental</pre>

<pre>health care. she clearly has no understanding of the nature</pre>

<pre>of most therapist-patient relationships, and decided</pre>

<pre>to fill a column with assumptions and misreprentations.</pre>

<pre>she's advocating a very irresponsible position.</pre>

<pre></pre>

<pre>does mit have a "suicide problem"? yes. do we solve it</pre>

<pre>by making people (more) afraid to seek therapy? uh, no.</pre>

<pre></pre>

<pre>susan buchman '01</pre>
</html>

--------------2F60F285ECF3FF726B3A33CC--


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation on the use of the mailing lists mit-talk, all-talk,
mit-news, housing-talk, and the mit-talk Zephyr class is available at:
http://web.mit.edu/institvte/talk/

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post