[7022] in SIPB bug reports
Re: "the sipb locker seems to be content..."
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brad Thompson)
Sat Oct 10 15:47:08 1998
To: Salvatore Valente <svalente@MIT.EDU>
Cc: bug-sipb@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 10 Oct 1998 03:24:58 EDT."
<199810100724.DAA14839@StarbaseZero.ne.mediaone.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 15:47:00 EDT
From: Brad Thompson <yak@MIT.EDU>
> The following complaint has been lodged:
>
> "the sipb locker seems to be content to deal with new platforms with
> symlinks."
Has anyone actually had a problem that could be traced to this?
Negative does not mean that what we do is right, but positive is a
really good way to show we are wrong.
Incidentally, are there more than a single-digit number each of
pmax_ul4, vax_bsd43, hp700_*, sgi_5*, sun4os_*, sun4?_5[^6], or
i386_linux1 systems out there? i.e. is there any reason to care any
more about anything but sun4x_56, sgi_6[23], i386_{linux[23],nbsd1},
and alpha_dux4?
yak
