[7027] in SIPB bug reports

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: "the sipb locker seems to be content..."

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aaron M. Ucko)
Sat Oct 10 16:17:26 1998

To: Erik Nygren <nygren@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Brad Thompson <yak@MIT.EDU>, Salvatore Valente <svalente@MIT.EDU>,
        bug-sipb@MIT.EDU
From: amu@MIT.EDU (Aaron M. Ucko)
Date: 10 Oct 1998 16:17:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: Erik Nygren's message of "Sat, 10 Oct 1998 16:11:27 EDT"

<nygren@MIT.EDU> (Erik Nygren) writes:

> I've recently heard people mention that they're running Linux machines
> with 1.2.13 kernels.  Not sure how many of those are around, but we
> may want to keep i386_linux1 for some time anyways (and just not keep
> adding things for those platforms).  Having Ultrix and SunOS and vax
> binaries around is probably convenient for people with restored cruft
> sitting around places.  It might be a good idea to say somewhere
> what platforms are *not* supported...

Remember, i386_linux1/2 is really a.out/ELF...I'm pretty sure there's
a package for 1.2.13 with a default sysname of i386_linux2.  That
said, however, I don't see any particular reason to get rid of working
binaries for crufty architectures unless we're really tight on space.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC <amu@mit.edu> (finger amu@monk.mit.edu)

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post