| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: yandros@MIT.EDU Date: Tue, 3 Jan 1995 18:52:25 -0500 To: hartmans@MIT.EDU Cc: bug-sipb@MIT.EDU In-Reply-To: <9501031728.AA16044@tertius.mit.edu> (message from Sam Hartman on Tue, 03 Jan 1995 12:28:26 EST) The last time we looked seriously at idraw Sal went and got the latest sources and tried building from scratch. As I recall they could not have compiled on any system I've ever heard of except possibly the old Symbolics Lisp machine C compiler (ask Mark Eichin); there were things like missing semicolons and important include statements missing from source code. I suspect that the latest distribution was prepared by an experimental AI based loosely on `eliza', `yow', `B1FF', `travesty', and `dissociated-press in emacs'. The current binary was produced by John Carr, for whom RS/6000's *will* compile meaningless code such as this (..and RT's will write the meaningless code and then compile it, if John asks them to). It's prett evident that the group punted IV completely for Fresco; I've been meaning to look at that and see if there's a good idraw clone in it. In the meantime, I've been suggesting xfig. If someone knows of something better (or just `as good', or `almost as good', or even `good enough to be useful'), let us know... chad
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |