[24050] in APO-L
Re: [APO-L] Intrachapter dating
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rosanne Rohana)
Mon Dec 8 14:14:26 2003
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:12:25 -0500
Reply-To: Rosanne Rohana <rjr11@po.cwru.edu>
From: Rosanne Rohana <rjr11@po.cwru.edu>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
In-Reply-To: <AJEJJHLFHAOOGGHILKDKCEPKCBAA.corporateslave@optonline.net>
There was (and still is) a fair amount of interchapter dating when I was an
active, including active/pledge, officer/non-officer, president/pledge
pairings, both pre-existing and new. It was never a problem and was rarely,
if ever, discussed.
I would question restricting anything based on relationships, romantic or
otherwise. People can have just as much loyalty to a best friend as a
significant other... and I doubt you would ever restrict someone's voting
rights based on the fact that they were voting on/for a good friend.
Just my two cents :-)
Rosanne Rohana
Theta Upsilon (Case Western Reserve U.) Alum
-----Original Message-----
From: Alpha Phi Omega Discussion List
[mailto:APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU]On Behalf Of Christine L Rossman
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 1:05 PM
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
Subject: Re: [APO-L] Intrachapter dating
My chapter had a pre-existing relationship between an active and a pledge,
and the only restriction we placed was that the active had to abstain
whenever there were votes of confidence or final votes on the pledge he was
dating.
Christine Rossman
Alpha Delta Eta (SUNY Albany) Alum/Advisor
Section 88 Staff
Life Member
