[5878] in APO Printshop
Re: Non-profit rules and the current discussion (long)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sophie)
Wed Jan 6 22:58:02 2010
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001062118450.4482@e51-075-2.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:58:00 -0500
From: Sophie <sophical@MIT.EDU>
To: "Leonard H Tower Jr." <tower@alum.mit.edu>, Ellen Kranzer <ccrazy@mit.edu>
Cc: apo-printshop@mit.edu
--00504502cc01ba5c6e047c8b1345
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Thanks very much for the work put into this explanation!
The only thing I want to respond to is:
i would like to see the press shop, and the chapter go back to the
> policies we had up to 5 to 15 years ago (in place since @ least the
> early '60s, on what use of chapter (i.e. MIT) equipment and resources
> is allowed, and what isn't.
> policies that respected the law and MIT policies and procedures
>
> perhaps once this is understood and agreed upon,
> the actives could choose to make it a standing policy
>
> it will be some days (hopefully not weeks) until i can really go into
> this more
>
If there's policy to be made or clarified by the active brothers, a good way
to do this might be for those who understand the relevant rules (when you
schedules allow, of course) to explain the issue to {rulescomm and
interested printshop people} or {exec and interested printshop people}. As
evidenced by having an active (well, it was active last spring) rulescomm
and upcoming bylaws amendments, I think there is interest among actives in
maintaining correct policy. Any standing policy will of course then have to
run by exec, who will explain it to the chapter as a whole before a vote is
taken.
--00504502cc01ba5c6e047c8b1345
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks very much for the work put into this explanation!<br><br>The only th=
ing I want to respond to is:<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote =
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); m=
argin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
i would like to see the press shop, and the chapter go back to the<br>
policies we had up to 5 to 15 years ago (in place since @ least the<br>
early '60s, on what use of chapter (i.e. MIT) equipment and resources<b=
r>
is allowed, and what isn't.<br>
policies that respected the law and MIT policies and procedures<br>
<br>
perhaps once this is understood and agreed upon,<br>
the actives could choose to make it a standing policy<br>
<br>
it will be some days (hopefully not weeks) until i can really go into<br>
this more<br></blockquote><div><br>If there's policy to be made or clar=
ified by the active brothers, a good way to do this might be for those who =
understand the relevant rules (when you schedules allow, of course) to expl=
ain the issue to {rulescomm and interested printshop people} or {exec and i=
nterested printshop people}.=A0 As evidenced by having an active (well, it =
was active last spring) rulescomm and upcoming bylaws amendments, I think t=
here is interest among actives in maintaining correct policy.=A0 Any standi=
ng policy will of course then have to run by exec, who will explain it to t=
he chapter as a whole before a vote is taken.<br>
</div></div>
--00504502cc01ba5c6e047c8b1345--
