[8865] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: test of new Location header usage
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joseph R Barge)
Wed Aug 9 23:21:53 1995
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 1995 23:15:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Joseph R Barge <jrbarge@umich.edu>
To: hartill@lanl.gov
Cc: decoux@moulon.inra.fr, www-talk@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <199508091546.AA143183164@ooo.lanl.gov>
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
Could someone please take me off of this list. My reason for signing on
has since disappeared so I would greatly appreciate instructions to help
me, or if someone just did it I would be eternally grateful!! Thank You
On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Rob Hartill wrote:
>
> > Only historical reason : the first spec (CGI 1.0) defined only `Content-type'
> > and `Location'. `Status' was added for CGI 1.1
> >
> > I don't know why you want add a status code, when Location imply a code 302.
>
> Location doesn't necessarily imply "302". "301" is prefectly acceptable,
> and preferably in many cases.
>
>
> rob
>
>
