[8873] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: test of new Location header usage
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joseph R Barge)
Thu Aug 10 23:36:11 1995
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 23:35:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Joseph R Barge <jrbarge@umich.edu>
To: hartill@lanl.gov, decoux@moulon.inra.fr, www-talk@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950809231346.23508A-100000@joust.rs.itd.umich.edu>
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
Thanks for resonding
On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Joseph R Barge wrote:
> Could someone please take me off of this list. My reason for signing on
> has since disappeared so I would greatly appreciate instructions to help
> me, or if someone just did it I would be eternally grateful!! Thank You
>
> On Wed, 9 Aug 1995, Rob Hartill wrote:
>
> >
> > > Only historical reason : the first spec (CGI 1.0) defined only `Content-type'
> > > and `Location'. `Status' was added for CGI 1.1
> > >
> > > I don't know why you want add a status code, when Location imply a code 302.
> >
> > Location doesn't necessarily imply "302". "301" is prefectly acceptable,
> > and preferably in many cases.
> >
> >
> > rob
> >
> >
>
>
