[8856] in www-talk@info.cern.ch
Re: test of new Location header usage
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rob Hartill)
Wed Aug 9 11:52:58 1995
From: Rob Hartill <hartill@ooo.lanl.gov>
To: decoux@moulon.inra.fr
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 95 9:46:04 MDT
Cc: www-talk@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <199508091218.OAA21291@moulon.inra.fr>; from "ts" at Aug 9, 95 2:18 pm
Reply-To: hartill@lanl.gov
Resent-From: www-talk@w3.org
> Only historical reason : the first spec (CGI 1.0) defined only `Content-type'
> and `Location'. `Status' was added for CGI 1.1
>
> I don't know why you want add a status code, when Location imply a code 302.
Location doesn't necessarily imply "302". "301" is prefectly acceptable,
and preferably in many cases.
rob
