[3242] in WWW Security List Archive
Re: I believe you is partly responsible if the obsene message i
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark G. Scheuern)
Mon Oct 14 20:39:18 1996
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 18:50:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Mark G. Scheuern" <mgscheue@Oakland.edu>
To: Brian Harvell <harvell@inet.net>
cc: Quantum <quantum@obsidian.cse.fau.edu>, Tersian <tersian@leba.net>,
David Murray <dmurray@pdssoftware.com>, www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.961014123236.9434A-100000@bahu>
Errors-To: owner-www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
Since this "discussion" has absolutely nothing to do with the topic
of this mailing list, namely WWW security, kindly take it to private
email.
Mark
On Mon, 14 Oct 1996, Brian Harvell wrote:
> Once again? That was the first time I responded my friend. I would say
> he broke the providers rules and it's probably written on a user agreement.
> I'm not saying it's a big deal either, but apparently it is against the rules
> of his provider. I know plenty of providers that will drop you for spamming.
> The $20 isn't worth the hassle of dealing with the pissed people.
>
> Brian
>
> ps don't you mean offensive and persecuted?
