[3237] in WWW Security List Archive
Re: I believe you is partly responsible if the obsene message i
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Harvell)
Mon Oct 14 15:13:52 1996
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 12:43:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Brian Harvell <harvell@inet.net>
To: Quantum <quantum@obsidian.cse.fau.edu>
cc: Tersian <tersian@leba.net>, David Murray <dmurray@pdssoftware.com>,
www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961014111935.2405A-100000@obsidian.cse.fau.edu>
Errors-To: owner-www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
> > And what brings you to this conclusion? I think the boy over in Switzerland
> > thought the same thing, but as that showed, you break the rules you pay the
> > price.
> >
> > You can't tell me he thought it wasn't wrong. Barring a mental problem that
>
> once again you have demonstrated that you have a problem drawing
> conclusions and putting words in my mouth.. I didnt say what he did wasnt
> wrong.. I said it was no big deal.. and if you think sending one (1) fake
> mail message is a big deal then I guess we have a differing of opinions.
> For number two.. what rule did he break ? I dont see it written anywhere
> that abusing a mailing list is against any big rule book.. we find it
> offencive yes, but if people can be persucuted for being offencive half
> the world would be in jail..
Once again? That was the first time I responded my friend. I would say
he broke the providers rules and it's probably written on a user agreement.
I'm not saying it's a big deal either, but apparently it is against the rules
of his provider. I know plenty of providers that will drop you for spamming.
The $20 isn't worth the hassle of dealing with the pissed people.
Brian
ps don't you mean offensive and persecuted?
Brian Harvell harvell@iNet.net http://www.iNet.net/~harvell
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc
