[91930] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qIHpu'ghach wa'DIch: 'ay' cha'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh)
Sun Jan 29 00:54:30 2012
From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:54:11 +1000
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmP0TaY=YUeGZwEHDCscJ+k4M-Vzihk5vz2q6tFjCO5GuA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
--===============0580254984562975025==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_d7df2355-d367-4a75-a914-456ed824e2cb_"
--_d7df2355-d367-4a75-a914-456ed824e2cb_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
jIghItlhpu'=2C jIjatlh:
> Borg ngogh'a' [2]=2C=20
> [2] Opinions on {ngogh'a'}?
mujang De'vID=2C jatlh:
> Do you mean on {Borg ngogh'a'} for "Borg cube"=2C or just {ngogh'a'} for =
"cube"?
Yep=2C on {Borg ngogh'a'} as a translation of "Borg cube".
taH:
> I don't think "cube" when I read {ngogh'a'}=2C just a big block (i.e=2C s=
omething with six faces=2C two perpendicular to each 3-D axis=2C but not ne=
cessarily equal in size). That may be sufficient to express the idea.
Awesome. That's more or less exactly what I mean.
jangpu' loghaD=2C jatlh:> I'd argue that Borg ngogh would be sufficient=2C =
however=3B Borg ngogh'a'=20
would suggest that it was remarkable even by Borg Cube standards
My counter-argument would be that {-'a'} applies only to the word {ngogh}=
=2C not the whole phrase=2C and the {Borg ngogh'a'} certainly is remarkable=
by the standards of what usually constitutes a {ngogh}. The only canon exa=
mples of it to date refer to pillows=2C loaves of bread=2C chocolate and bu=
ilding bricks=2C and the Borg cube beats all of them by a huge margin.
QeS 'utlh
=
--_d7df2355-d367-4a75-a914-456ed824e2cb_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt=3B
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>
jIghItlhpu'=2C jIjatlh:<br>>=3B Borg ngogh'a' [2]=2C <br><div>
>=3B [2] Opinions on {ngogh'a'}?<BR><br><BR>mujang De'vID=2C jatlh:<br><B=
R>
>=3B Do you mean on {Borg ngogh'a'} for "Borg cube"=2C or just {ngogh'a'}=
for "cube"?<BR><br><BR>Yep=2C on {Borg ngogh'a'} as a translation of "Borg=
cube".<br><BR><br><BR>
taH:<br><BR>>=3B I don't think "cube" when I read {ngogh'a'}=2C just a bi=
g block (i.e=2C something with six faces=2C two perpendicular to each 3-D a=
xis=2C but not necessarily equal in size). =3B That may be sufficient t=
o express the idea.<BR><br><BR>Awesome. That's more or less exactly what I =
mean.<br><BR><br><BR>jangpu' loghaD=2C jatlh:<BR>>=3B I'd argue that Borg=
ngogh would be sufficient=2C however=3B Borg ngogh'a'=20
would suggest that it was remarkable even by Borg Cube standards<BR><br><BR=
>My counter-argument would be that {-'a'} applies only to the word {ngogh}=
=2C not the whole phrase=2C and the {Borg ngogh'a'} certainly is remarkable=
by the standards of what usually constitutes a {ngogh}. The only canon exa=
mples of it to date refer to pillows=2C loaves of bread=2C chocolate and bu=
ilding bricks=2C and the Borg cube beats all of them by a huge margin.<br><=
BR><br><BR>QeS 'utlh<br><BR></div> </div></body>
</html>=
--_d7df2355-d367-4a75-a914-456ed824e2cb_--
--===============0580254984562975025==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============0580254984562975025==--
