[89408] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'maH cha'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh)
Sat Sep 3 03:46:23 2011
From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 17:40:46 +1000
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110901085342.07ece620@flyingstart.ca>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
povtaH. puS qay'law'bogh Dochmey.
ghItlhpu' Qov, jatlh:
>nachDaj Der[6] QeDpIn.
:P
The semantics aside, Der is intransitive, no? I think this should be DermoH.
ghunchu'wI' makes a good point that perhaps it might be simpler to describe
the intent behind the action rather than the action itself. In this case,
how about something like 'olbe' QeDpIn "the science officer did not verify
it"?
QeS 'utlh
----------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:05:48 -0700
> To: tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org
> From: robyn@flyingstart.ca
> Subject: nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'maH cha'
>
> taHlI' lut. maHun HoD DujDaq maHtaH vaj QIchchaj mughlu'ba'.
>
> 12
>
> qaSpu'DI' wej'maH tup meHDaq chegh HoD. chIjwI' yaH ghoS 'ej ghaHvaD
> jatlh "ghoch chu' yIghun. naDev Quv tu'lu'." yaHDajDaq navHom lan
> HoD. pa', navHomDaq chagh bIQHom. SaQtaH chIjwI' pay' 'e' tlhoj HoD.
> He ghuntaHvIS chIjwI' QomtaH volchaHDu'Daj 'ej cha'logh mInDu' yach
> ghopDaj. "chu'ta, HoD," jatlh, 'ej ghogh ngaDmoH 'e' Qap.
>
> "maj" jatlh HoD. navHom nge'. QeDpInvaD jatlh, "pa'wIjDaq HItlhej."
>
> HoD pa'Daq QeDpInvaD navHom cha'. "Quv vIghovbe'," jatlh QeDpIn.
>
> "potlhbe' Quv," jatlh HoD. "yuQ ram 'oH. pa' tlhIngan wo' Duy tu'lu'.
> Sungpu'vaD Satlh ghojmoHlI'. 'a qatlh yIQ navHom?"
>
> navHom Hot 'e' mev QeDpIn. "taS vIpojlaH. bIQ rur. chaq pey 'oH. chaq
> SuQ. nuqDaq--"
>
> Hagh 'ej qagh HoD. "navwIj 'oH. bIQ na' 'oH neH. SaQtaH chIjwI'.
> qatlh? nuQ'a' vay'?"
>
> nachDaj Der[6] QeDpIn. "vItu'be'. batlh toy'law' 'ej qun pagh."
>
> "toH. yaHDaj yItlhap. naDev ghaH yIngeH."
>
> mej QeDpIn 'ej tugh 'el chIjwI'. yIQbe' qabDaj 'ach Doq mInDu'.
>
> "yIba'," jatlh HoD. "nIghIj'a' tlhInganpu'?"
>
> "loQ," jang chIjwI'. "vaQ chaH. bIjatlhtaHvIS buQchuq."
>
> "Sun Hutlh. nubuQbe'."
>
> "'e' vISov."
>
> "vaj SoHvaD qay' nuq?"
>
> SaQqa' chIjwI'. "Dujoy'mo'. Dujoy' 'ej pa' bIQam ... tu'lummey'e'
> DangevtaHvIS!"
>
> "mujoy'be' ghaH. ben ghaHvaD jIbom. nov qab ghovlaHbe'mo' tlhIngan,
> mughovlaHmeH DeSDu'wIj vI'angnIS. DaHjaj ghaHvaD jIbomqa'. malja' 'oH
> neH. pItlh."
>
> "jIQoS."
>
> "qay'be'. batlh bItoy'. bI'IQ vIneHbe'. yaHlIj yIghoS. meH DaSeH."
>
> "luq HoD!" jatlh. HoD pa' lojmIt poSmoHDI' latlhpu'vaD jatlh HoD.
> "meH SeH ghaH."
>
> SoQqa'pa' lojmIt 'elqa' QeDpIn.
>
> "vaj qaStaH nuq?"
>
> "mujoy' tlhIngan 'e' Har. 'IQmoH. mujoy'be' jIjatlh. QuchmoH. rIntaH."
>
> "rInbe'!" HoD DeS 'angmeH, pe'vIl HoD tlhay vIH QeDpIn.
> "Dajoy'lu'ba'. beq DaghIjtaH. DaH tlhInganvaD Qu' Data'lI'. qatlh?"
>
> yev HoD. "lojmIt yIngaQmoH."
>
> [6] I just told off QeS for doing the same thing. Does it work here?
> Is there a better way?
>
> Summary for the Klingon Impaired: In the eleventh chapter of an
> ongoing story the captain cheers up the navigator, but his science
> officer is not convinced that the matter is settled.
>
>
>
>
