[89407] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'maH wa'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh)
Sat Sep 3 03:16:03 2011
From: Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 17:08:51 +1000
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110901091838.07ebcc40@flyingstart.ca>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
jIghItlhpu', jIjatlh:
> See, you have the luxury of not being constrained by rhyme or meter, so I'm
> really finding it hard to offer much comment on your structure. :)
mujang Qov:
> QaplI' DupwIj. ghItlhlIj vIpojlI'mo' ghItlhwIj'e' DapojqangchoH.
Qaplaw'taH nablIj mIgh. :)
jIH:
> I'm too impatient for serials...
Qov:
> Hoch vIlI'chugh, QaghmeywI' vISambe' 'ej lut QIv DaHev. 'ej vIqonlI'mo' lut
> naQ DaHevpa' bIloSqu'nIS
toH, jIbepbe'. I'm just one of those people who with serials (or TV shows or
whatever) sits at home bouncing up and down anxiously going "When's the next
bit coming??" - which I guess is the point!
Qov:
> quq wej ghelwI'. "qaStaHvIS nuq?"
jIH:
> I'm not a big fan of this use of quq
Qov:
> I'm not a big fan of quq in general. I just wish it were an adverb.
Fair enough. For those instances where appropriate nouns exist it's perfect -
quq HeghwIj jaghwI' Hegh je, say. Elsewhere it's just a pain to try to stuff
the needed meanings in with {-ghach} or something.
> ghelchoHDI' wej nuv, quq ghoghmeyDaj.
>
> qaq'a'?
HIja', qaqlaw'.
QeS 'utlh
