[111382] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] DSC Klingon Trailer transcription (NOT offlist)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Thu Oct 5 07:26:08 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 13:47:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <cf8ec189-4489-e520-e933-a9a2ac7791a8@gmx.de>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============4712917527212982940==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------BEBD0B77B5E0DE43B435A714"
Content-Language: en-US

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------BEBD0B77B5E0DE43B435A714
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 10/4/2017 1:32 PM, Lieven wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 15:56 schrieb Steven Boozer:
>> Thanks.  Note taken.
>
> To your note you can add Robyn's answer on Twitte, who explained why 
> {DI-} was correct here. See the prefix trick is applied here.
>
> <<wa' may' wInob, 'a chaHvaD wInobmo' {DInob} jatlhlu'. muchvetlhvaD 
> ADR ta'nIS ghetwI' net wuqmeH @reanolan ta lulo'lu'.>> 

Then it is either in error or the definition of the prefix trick has 
been changed and we haven't been told.

    When the indirect object... is first or second person, the
    pronominal prefix which normally indicates first or second person
    object may be used. —Okrand, Re: Some quick questions...
    <http://klingonska.org/canon/1997-06-29a-news.txt>

*-DI'* indicates a third-person object.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name


--------------BEBD0B77B5E0DE43B435A714
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/4/2017 1:32 PM, Lieven wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:cf8ec189-4489-e520-e933-a9a2ac7791a8@gmx.de">Am
      04.10.2017 um 15:56 schrieb Steven Boozer:
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">Thanks.  Note
        taken.
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      To your note you can add Robyn's answer on Twitte, who explained
      why {DI-} was correct here. See the prefix trick is applied here.
      <br>
      <br>
      &lt;&lt;wa' may' wInob, 'a chaHvaD wInobmo' {DInob} jatlhlu'.
      muchvetlhvaD ADR ta'nIS ghetwI' net wuqmeH @reanolan ta
      lulo'lu'.&gt;&gt;
    </blockquote>
    <p>Then it is either in error or the definition of the prefix trick
      has been changed and we haven't been told.</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>When the indirect object... is first or second person, the
        pronominal prefix which normally indicates first or second
        person object may be used. —Okrand, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="http://klingonska.org/canon/1997-06-29a-news.txt">Re:
          Some quick questions...</a><br>
      </p>
    </blockquote>
    <p><b>-DI'</b> indicates a third-person object.<br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------BEBD0B77B5E0DE43B435A714--

--===============4712917527212982940==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============4712917527212982940==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post