[111381] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] DSC Klingon Trailer transcription (NOT offlist)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Thu Oct 5 07:26:06 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 13:48:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <16007031-aec5-1c44-a7d5-32b19670ff79@trimboli.name>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============3311096247222041038==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------C926C84DC43F7C30C7DB25C6"
Content-Language: en-US
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------C926C84DC43F7C30C7DB25C6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 10/4/2017 1:47 PM, SuStel wrote:
> On 10/4/2017 1:32 PM, Lieven wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2017 um 15:56 schrieb Steven Boozer:
>>> Thanks. Note taken.
>>
>> To your note you can add Robyn's answer on Twitte, who explained why
>> {DI-} was correct here. See the prefix trick is applied here.
>>
>> <<wa' may' wInob, 'a chaHvaD wInobmo' {DInob} jatlhlu'. muchvetlhvaD
>> ADR ta'nIS ghetwI' net wuqmeH @reanolan ta lulo'lu'.>>
>
> Then it is either in error or the definition of the prefix trick has
> been changed and we haven't been told.
>
> When the indirect object... is first or second person, the
> pronominal prefix which normally indicates first or second person
> object may be used. —Okrand, Re: Some quick questions...
> <http://klingonska.org/canon/1997-06-29a-news.txt>
>
> *-DI'* indicates a third-person object.
>
Pardon me: *DI-* indicates a third-person object.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
--------------C926C84DC43F7C30C7DB25C6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/4/2017 1:47 PM, SuStel wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:16007031-aec5-1c44-a7d5-32b19670ff79@trimboli.name">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/4/2017 1:32 PM, Lieven wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:cf8ec189-4489-e520-e933-a9a2ac7791a8@gmx.de">Am
04.10.2017 um 15:56 schrieb Steven Boozer: <br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">Thanks. Note
taken. <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
To your note you can add Robyn's answer on Twitte, who explained
why {DI-} was correct here. See the prefix trick is applied
here. <br>
<br>
<<wa' may' wInob, 'a chaHvaD wInobmo' {DInob} jatlhlu'.
muchvetlhvaD ADR ta'nIS ghetwI' net wuqmeH @reanolan ta
lulo'lu'.>> </blockquote>
<p>Then it is either in error or the definition of the prefix
trick has been changed and we haven't been told.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>When the indirect object... is first or second person, the
pronominal prefix which normally indicates first or second
person object may be used. —Okrand, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://klingonska.org/canon/1997-06-29a-news.txt">Re:
Some quick questions...</a><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>-DI'</b> indicates a third-person object.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Pardon me: <b>DI-</b> indicates a third-person object.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------C926C84DC43F7C30C7DB25C6--
--===============3311096247222041038==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============3311096247222041038==--
