[110523] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Is Star Trek: Discovery a new canon category?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Thu Aug 10 23:05:22 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 23:05:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAG84SOvHCNSWhLgGzuFQgyKymXYwbZ171AiTVaUdByzcbKtz3w@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0062674554084517163==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------060903000902050306080703"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060903000902050306080703
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 8/10/2017 10:28 PM, nIqolay Q wrote:
> One of the major differences between Discovery and Klingon Hamlet is
> that Discovery is going to be Actual Star Trek Canon. As far as the
> Star Trek fanbase at large is concerned, Qov's sentences are going to
> be as canonical as anything else on the shows and movies.
Yes, as canonical as "quab jee nah geel." That's the canon of /Star
Trek,/ not the canon of Okrand. They are not the same thing.
> If Okrand ends up approving it as "real Klingon" in some way (either
> as standard "Maltz Hol" or an artifact of some dialect), like he's
> done with all the other stuff presented as Klingon on the show but not
> written by him,
Okrand has occasionally retconned something from S/tar Trek,/ but no way
has he done this to "all the other stuff presented as Klingon on the
show." I'd say he'd probably be more likely to retcon or confirm
something by Qov, since he knows her and certain parties on this list
will pester him about any perceived problem, but that's not a rubber stamp.
--
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/
--------------060903000902050306080703
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/10/2017 10:28 PM, nIqolay Q wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAG84SOvHCNSWhLgGzuFQgyKymXYwbZ171AiTVaUdByzcbKtz3w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">One of the major differences between Discovery and
Klingon Hamlet is that Discovery is going to be Actual Star Trek
Canon. As far as the Star Trek fanbase at large is concerned,
Qov's sentences are going to be as canonical as anything else on
the shows and movies.</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Yes, as canonical as "quab jee nah geel." That's the canon of <i>Star
Trek,</i> not the canon of Okrand. They are not the same thing.<br>
</p>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAG84SOvHCNSWhLgGzuFQgyKymXYwbZ171AiTVaUdByzcbKtz3w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">If Okrand ends up approving it as "real Klingon" in
some way (either as standard "Maltz Hol" or an artifact of some
dialect), like he's done with all the other stuff presented as
Klingon on the show but not written by him,</blockquote>
<br>
<p>Okrand has occasionally retconned something from S<i>tar Trek,</i>
but no way has he done this to "all the other stuff presented as
Klingon on the show." I'd say he'd probably be more likely to
retcon or confirm something by Qov, since he knows her and certain
parties on this list will pester him about any perceived problem,
but that's not a rubber stamp.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.trimboli.name/">http://www.trimboli.name/</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------060903000902050306080703--
--===============0062674554084517163==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============0062674554084517163==--
