[110449] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Reversing the order of {-vo'}

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Anderson)
Thu Aug 10 08:07:46 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmNO6dfd5CBaN3uokQv6gbnAnfm_Kbod_C7kRpkintvSqg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alan Anderson <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 08:07:21 -0400
To: Klingon language email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

--===============1794977166079150187==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c11694283b1c0556650b9b"

--001a11c11694283b1c0556650b9b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:

> ...Consider the following:
> {[vaS'a']vo' [tera'Daq DIvI' ra'ghom qach]Daq chegh}
> {[tera'Daq DIvI' ra'ghom qachDaq vaS'a']vo' chegh}
>

Qo'.

You seem to be suggesting that we parse {tera'Daq DIvI' ra'ghom qach} and
{tera'Daq DIvI' raghom qachDaq vaS'a'} as noun phrases bearing a Type 5
suffix on the final noun. However, that treatment violates the prohibition
of a Type 5 suffix on the first noun of such a phrase.

I will not consider them further.

-- ghunchu'wI'

--001a11c11694283b1c0556650b9b
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
hu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:38 AM, De&#39;vID <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"ma=
ilto:de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">...Consider the follow=
ing:<br>
{[vaS&#39;a&#39;]vo&#39; [tera&#39;Daq DIvI&#39; ra&#39;ghom qach]Daq chegh=
}<br>
<span class=3D"im HOEnZb">{[tera&#39;Daq DIvI&#39; ra&#39;ghom qachDaq vaS&=
#39;a&#39;]vo&#39; chegh}<br></span></blockquote><div><br>Qo&#39;.</div><di=
v><br></div><div>You seem to be suggesting that we parse {tera&#39;Daq DIvI=
&#39; ra&#39;ghom qach} and {tera&#39;Daq DIvI&#39; raghom qachDaq vaS&#39;=
a&#39;} as noun phrases bearing a Type 5 suffix on the final noun. However,=
 that treatment violates the prohibition of a Type 5 suffix on the first no=
un of such a phrase.<br><br>I will not consider them further.<br><br>-- ghu=
nchu&#39;wI&#39;</div></div></div></div>

--001a11c11694283b1c0556650b9b--

--===============1794977166079150187==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============1794977166079150187==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post