[109648] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] This day
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Wed May 24 21:21:54 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:21:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAFK8js3DAnKO+vg9mJkHp2BEDvd7K4xBH-R3KB4gQ4BpFBYtSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============2835382707268188625==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_55312A7F-82D4-4572-9940-576330A67408_"
--_55312A7F-82D4-4572-9940-576330A67408_
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
The trouble with {maqIHbogh jaj} is that the relative clause has no head.
--=20
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
From: Alan Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:28 PM
To: Klingon language email discussion forum
Subject: Re: [tlhIngan Hol] This day
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
{maqIHbogh jaj} sounds wrong.
I think it sounds as wrong as {jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'} and {DaH=C2=A0naD=
ev=C2=A0jIHtaHbogh=C2=A0meq Saja'}. The first phrase is in TKD; the second =
is in the paq'batlh. If I encountered {maqIHbogh jaj} without warning, I'd =
definitely notice it as unusual, but I don't think I would have a problem u=
nderstanding it.
The only "canon precedent" I know of is the one already noted from TKW.
-- ghunchu'wI'
--_55312A7F-82D4-4572-9940-576330A67408_
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
<html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:sc=
hemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/of=
fice/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta ht=
tp-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"><meta name=
=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.gmail-il
{mso-style-name:gmail-il;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3D"#954F72"><div cla=
ss=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal>The trouble with {maqIHbogh jaj} is =
that the relative clause has no head.</p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </=
o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>-- <br>SuStel<br>http://trimboli.name</p><p cl=
ass=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style=3D'mso-element:para-border-=
div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><=
p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'border:none;padding:0in'><b>From: </b><a href=
=3D"mailto:qunchuy@alcaco.net">Alan Anderson</a><br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday,=
May 24, 2017 6:28 PM<br><b>To: </b><a href=3D"mailto:tlhingan-hol@kli.org"=
>Klingon language email discussion forum</a><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [tlhIng=
an Hol] This day</p></div><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><d=
iv><div><p class=3DMsoNormal>On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Lieven <<a=
href=3D"mailto:levinius@gmx.de" target=3D"_blank">levinius@gmx.de</a>> =
wrote:</p><blockquote style=3D'border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;=
padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in'><p class=3DMs=
oNormal>{maqIHbogh jaj} sounds wrong.</p></blockquote></div><p class=3DMsoN=
ormal><br>I think it sounds as wrong as {jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'} and {Da=
H <span class=3Dgmail-il>naDev</span> <span class=3Dgmail-il>jIHt=
aHbogh</span> meq Saja'}. The first phrase is in TKD; the second is in=
the paq'batlh. If I encountered {maqIHbogh jaj} without warning, I'd defin=
itely notice it as unusual, but I don't think I would have a problem unders=
tanding it.<br><br>The only "canon precedent" I know of is the on=
e already noted from TKW.</p></div><div><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o=
:p></p></div></div><p class=3DMsoNormal>-- ghunchu'wI'</p><p class=3DMsoNor=
mal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>=
--_55312A7F-82D4-4572-9940-576330A67408_--
--===============2835382707268188625==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============2835382707268188625==--