[109111] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] -lI': intentional or not?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Tue Feb 28 11:45:38 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:45:33 +0100
In-Reply-To: <2a480fa8-93fd-a7fb-9434-ca977c8da083@trimboli.name>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
Am 28.02.2017 um 16:26 schrieb SuStel:
> None of them are used to describe an agentless action, lending credence
> to the argument that the dearth of agentless *-lI'* shows that it isn't
> allowed.
Could you rephrase that, so that a non-native english speaking
non-linguist can understand, please.
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
